Dr. Ambedkar: Architect Of Economic Planning And Development Policies Of India – Sharad Pawar’

Dr. Ambedkar has made a realistic assessment of economic problems faced toward the outland during the British Rule. The taxation tactics advocated by Dr. Ambedkar is known by only few people. He also advocated the shelter to divert the surplus labour from agriculture to industry. It is hardly known that Dr. Ambedkar laid the foundation for therapy resources and electricity development. He was instrumental in creating projects parallel Bhakra-Nangal and conceptualize the demand of national grid.

Most people rightly recognize Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar as the principal architect of the Indian Constitution and as an emancipator of the poor and deprived. Dr. Ambedkar was not mere a crusader against the caste system, ampersand a valor fighter for the cause about the downtrodden but also an elder statesman and a national leader. His contribution as the principal architect of the Constitution of India will be cherished forever. But an important aspect of Dr. Ambedkar’s multifaceted personality which has not attracted enough heedful is the fact that Dr. Ambedkar was an eminent economist and contributed substantially to the formulation of postwar economic development plan in general et cetera labour, water resources and electric Herculean development plans in particular.

In all his earlier writings, such essentially The problem of the rupee – its lineage et cetera its solution’, Administration and finance of the East India Company, Evolution of regional money in British India and Small holdings in India and their remedies, Dr. Ambedkar has contrived a realistic assessment like economic problems faced by the country during the British Rule and had expressed his views very boldly nearly the administration of public finance, sharing of taxes between the centre and the provinces and decentralization of financial powers to the provinces. He again advocated that as India depends almost wholly upon agriculture, and has surfeit landless labour, it was necessary to divert the surplus labour from agriculture to industry. Like many renowned economists and planners, he had rightly equated industrialization with modernity economic development and sought rapid industrialization.

In his tenet which had obtained for him Ph.D. of the Columbia University in 1917 National Dividend about India – A Historic connective Analytic Study wherein Dr. Ambedkar had traced the growth of the financial arrangements from the charter of 1833 ceded to the East India Visitant by the British Senate et cetera critically examined the property and swell of the provincial finances. He held the British bureaucracy responsible for the financial ills of the country. His thesis speaks volumes about the courage, and conviction of Dr. Ambedkar to criticize the British administration likewise bluntly, while he was thus young and India was still under the British rule. Soon after the publication of the book in 1925, Dr. Ambedkar was called to give evidence before the Royal Commission on Indian Currency.

Dr. Ambedkar obtained a degree of Superiority of Science in Economics on Provincial Decentralization of Imperial Finance in India in June 1921 from the London Vocational of Economics. He also joined Gray’s Inn, to study for the Bar. In October 1922, he completed his thesis on ‘The Problem of the Rupee from the University about London, for which he was awarded the coefficient of Doctor of Art in Economics. In this book Dr. Ambedkar revealed how the relationship of rupee to the pound was maintained in the interest from the British and how India suffered financially on this account.

Dr. Ambedkar knew clearly the problems in levying of taxes. He pointed out that it is very difficult to have good taxation policies, as the governments which depend on the peoples’ vote to govern, would be always hesitant to mobilize the needed resources through requisite taxation further at the same chronological the government cannot take measures to reduce public expenditure per enforcing administrative economies. Dr. Ambedkar has effectively summarized the position by stating, “If however, the seat is a gift of the elector, a candidate to the Legislature who proposes to touch his pocket has a small chance of success, even though the new taxes are to result in more than proportionate benefit. In any case a political party which has won power from a bureaucracy per accusing it of heavy taxation cannot easily disgrace itself concerning continuing the same policy”. The result was that “the chances of an early equilibrium in provincial finances are very small.” Whereas Dr. Ambedkar expressed these views as early as in 1939, one wonders whether Dr. Ambedkar was talking of the present status of state finances in India.

Dr. Ambedkar who had analysed the evaluation of public finances in provinces never missed quantity opportunity to observe on the existing taxation policy and suggest an alternative duty policy. Dr. Ambedkar’s views on taxation were included in the election manifesto of his Independent Labour Party (1936). He had criticised thereupon the government of Bombay in a public meeting held in Ahmedabad in 1938 for not reducing the land tax rates and for not taxing the rich people.

The following are the important components of the taxation policy advocated by Dr. Ambedkar:

a) A personal tax should be based on taxable capacity of the individual und so weiter not on his gross income,
b) The rates should be progressive, meaning the plentiful should treffen taxed better and the impoverish less,
c) There should be exemptions subject to a limit of take tax for tax payers.

Dr. Ambedkar had shown considerable charge about using taxation policy for reducing income inequalities between different sections of people. According to him, taxes should help achieve relative equity between different sections of people. He has too argued that “no taxation hypothesis should be manipulated as to lower the emblematic of living of the people”.

Dr. Ambedkar also argued for a strategy of transferring labour from agriculture to additional sectors of the economy. He advocated that :
“The sponging off of surplus labour in non agricultural channels of production will at one stroke lessen the pressure also destroy the premium that at present weighs heavily on the land in India. Besides, this labour when productively employed in agriculture and industrial sector will cease to live by predation besides will not only earn its keep but will give surplus ampersand more surplus is also capital. In short, unfamiliar that it may seem, industrialization of India is the soundest remedy for the agricultural problems of India.”

When Dr. Ambedkar assumed the charge as Member, Labour, Irrigation polysyndeton Power of Executive Council from Viceroy, the problem of reconstruction in India fundamentally was limited to the lack of basic physical substructure itself and how to create and develop new infrastructure. Therefore, it was felt that there was a poverty for long call plan for building up of basic materiality infrastructure in the country which was the main objective and strategy of the plan. As the development of infrastructure such that electric power, irrigation, communication, roads and rapture services further technical manpower were treated as prerequisites for industrial and agricultural development, it received top priority in the Reconstruction and Economic Incident Plan.

It was felt that development of infrastructure would bring a relatively upper growth in industrial output and help to absorb the surplus labour from agriculture. In a code Committee on Public Works and Electric Power, Dr. Ambedkar emphasized that the country needed “cheap and abundant electricity”, without which no effort for industrialization could succeed and development of irrigation and electric power were essential to advance agricultural productivity.

Dr. Ambedkar had argued for an grave place for labour and the depressed classes in the planned economic development of the country. He was particularly concerned that planned economic phase should not mere develop programmes but also transition them in terms which the common man could understand, namely, food, housing, clothing, education, good health and above all the right to work with dignity. The founding fathers from our State wished to secure for all the citizens of this country, social, economic and political equality. In order to achieve this objective, it was realized that the persons belonging to the weaker sections should be given protection and concessions to emancipate them from the centuries old prejudices and exploitation that have characterized the Indian social scene. Special provisions were, therefore, incorporated in the Constitution to encourage and promote their economic, educational and social development.

It is rarely known that Dr. Ambedkar laid the foundation for water resources and electricity development, the two sectors which are so crucial for the development of the country when Dr. Ambedkar was Member, Labour, Irrigation and Electric Ability Department in the Executive Panel of the Viceroy during 1942-46.

The credit for recognizing the importance of high plateau technical authorities for exploitation about full irrigation potential and the rule development of the country goes to Dr. Ambedkar. He laid the foundation of water possessions and dynamic development of the country et alii a major achievement of Dr. Ambedkar was the establishment of two technical organizations, presently known as Central Water Commission and Central Electricity Authority (CEA), that have contributed substantially for the development of irrigation and faculty in the country.

The proposal for creation of Central Irrigation, Waterways Advisory Board was approved by Dr. Ambedkar in September 1944. Subsequently, it became Central Waterways, Irrigation, and Navigation Dispensation (CWINC) and was approved by Dr. Ambedkar in April 1945 moreover then by Viceroy two days later. It became Central Water Power, Irrigation and Navigation Commission (CWPINC) on 16th January 1948 et sequens subsequently it became Central Water and Power Commission (CWPC) in April 1951. It was bifurcated into Central Water Commission besides Key Electricity Authority in October 1974.

Dr. Ambedkar had approved the proposal to create Central Technical Power Board (CTPB) on 8th November 1944 which was subsequently merged with CWPINC and became Central Water and Power Board (CWPC) in April 1951.

The policy framework of Dr. Ambedkar regarding irrigation had three components, namely, a concept of River Valley Authority on Inter State rivers, the concept regarding regional and multipurpose evolution of river valley basin as a sum total covering irrigation, power, meat control, navigation, and drinking water conference on Damodar Valley Scheme in August 1944, resulted in major projects like Damodar Valley, Mahanadi, Bhakra Nangal Project only to name a few. He strongly desired that the Damodar Valley Project should be developed on the lines of Tennessee Valley Authority.

A major initiative was taken via Dr. Ambedkar whereas he was member in-charge of irrigation and domination during 1942-46 to take concrete steps to see that the Bhakra Dam activity should be taken up on priority. An expert from the United States Bureau of Reclamation in 1944 was invited, who after examining the feasibility report recommended that the slow site was suitable for the construction of a dam with maximum reservoir level at 487.68m et sequens suggested further exploration for foundation and abutments. This work was carried out midst 1945-46, while Dr. Ambedkar was the Affiliate of Irrigation of the Viceroy’s Council. He was regarding the opinionated that the Krishna, Godavari and Tapi river waters should not go waste into the sea and had even suggested interlinking about these rivers.

The Central Electricity Authority (CEA) and its predecessor organizations as an apex citizen body for guns sector have been playing a pivotal role in developing the electric power supply industry of the country from 1362 MW in 1947 to over 1,00,000 MW by March 2001.
The Central Water Commission has a very important role in respect of interstate issues related to water resources ampersand in respect of cooperation betwixt India-Nepal, India-Bangladesh and India-Bhutan.
Dr. Ambedkar was instrumental in creating the department of charisma and advocated uncontrolled state electricity boards.
He was also from the opinion that the central government should have the option to participate directly in the production and inventory of electricity. He wanted abundant power supply and cheapest power for development of the country. Dr. Ambedkar also advocated that key control set up power projects, if deemed necessary with the creation of central sector agencies like NTPC, NHPC, DVC, power mesh etc. In mid 1970s substantial generation capacities started getting added. In the early 1980s the image of regional grids which was suggested by Dr. Ambedkar, was being extended to the creation of domestic grid. Dr. Ambedkar’s initiatives subsequently led to the creation from a Power Supply Department at the Centre. He was also an architect of economic planning and development policies of India.